CRC submitted the following letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve to announce its formal opposition to the proposed merger of BMO Financial Corp/BMO Harris Bank, N.A. and BancWest Holding Inc./Bank of the West.


Download the full letter →
Read CRC’s statement on the announced public hearing →


Michael Hsu, Acting Comptroller
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
400 7th St SW,
Washington, DC 20219 


Jerome Powell, Chairman
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
20th Street and Constitution Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20551 


Re: California Reinvestment Coalition supplemental comments in opposition to the applications by BMO  Financial Corp and BMO Harris Bank, N.A. to acquire BancWest Holding Inc. and Bank of the West, call for public hearings and extension of the comment period. 

Dear Acting Comptroller Hsu and Chairman Powell, 

In light of the substantial impact that this proposed merger will have on California without a significant commitment to California communities, the California Reinvestment Coalition and twenty (20) community groups have opposed the applications by BMO Financial and BMO Harris Bank, N.A. to acquire BancWest  Holding Inc. and Bank of the West. 

In addition, we have called for public hearings on the merger to be held in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and  Fresno. We further urge the regulators to extend the comment period through the end of the public hearings to ensure that all impacted communities have a meaningful opportunity to provide comments to inform your deliberations. To their credit, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Office of the Comptroller of the  Currency did hold public hearings regarding the proposed merger of U.S. Bank and Union Bank. 

At the beginning of the year, we began constructive dialogue with BMO Harris regarding a Community Benefits  Agreement (CBA) that addresses community credit needs in California to ensure that any combined bank increases reinvestment activity in our state by at least 50%. At this time, we have received no formal response to our proposal, which was submitted to the Bank on February 25, 2022. We thank BMO Harris for beginning such discussions, and for making its CEO and key staff available to listen to over thirty (30) California nonprofit organizations describe community credit needs and concerns in February. We continue to await a reply and look forward to continuing a productive dialogue with the Bank for the good of California communities. 

We retain serious community reinvestment, systemic risk, consumer protection, and anti-competitive concerns relating to the proposed merger. As examples, we believe that Bank of the West has originated loans to  problematic landlords, that mortgage lending disparities persist, that BMO Harris has imposed excessive 

overdraft fees on its customers, and that both financial institutions have harmed the environment and contributed to climate change. A strong CBA is needed to ensure that any pro forma bank will: extend mortgages to all qualified home loan borrowers and communities; prevent displacement financing, support the many very small, women and BIPOC-owned small businesses serving our communities; refrain from charging consumers excessive overdraft and other fees; support the broadband needs of California’s diverse communities; engage in philanthropy at a level commensurate with the Bank’s size; and promote responsible stewardship of the environment and our economy by mitigating climate change and systemic risk while strengthening climate resiliency. 

Relevant information improperly withheld 

We believe the Applicant improperly seeks confidential treatment for a number of items that are already a  matter of public record or that should nonetheless be made available to the public in the context of this merger.  Specifically, we believe the following submissions should be made public: 

  • From the Bank’s April 12 response to the Additional Information (AI) request from the Federal Reserve: o Confidential Exhibit A which includes recent community investment partnerships by BMO-FG. o Confidential Exhibit B which includes recent CRA qualified investments in minority and women-led funds by BMO-FG. 

o Confidential Exhibit C which includes disbursed BMO-FG grants. 

o Confidential Exhibit D which includes organizations BOTW engaged to reach African American and Latine borrowers and communities.1 

  • From the Bank’s Application: 

o Confidential Exhibits P and Q which include Additional Information regarding BOTW and BMO  Litigation Matters, respectively.2 

We request the Board and the OCC refuse to provide confidential treatment for these submissions and make these exhibits part of the public record. 

Anti-Displacement Measures or Displacement Mortgages? 

We are concerned that Bank of the West has originated mortgage loans to problematic landlords that have unlawfully evicted California families. CRC has raised this concern regarding the lending practices of other financial institutions as well. We object to the funding of landlords that displace or harass tenants, unduly raise rents, and/or make units less affordable for the consumers and communities meant to benefit from the CRA.  This is all the more troubling where financial institutions have sought and received CRA credit for these displacement mortgages. CRC believes this is an all-too-common scenario where banks originate loans without sufficient due diligence, and then seek community development loan credit for loans secured by properties where the units may have been affordable to LMI residents at the time of origination, but which often foreseeably lead to the direct or indirect displacement of tenants and the loss of affordable units in a  community. It is hard to imagine a scenario that is more inconsistent with the goals of the CRA. 

1See Additional Information Regarding Application by Bank of Montreal and BMO Financial Corp. to Acquire Bank of the West, Letter from Applicants, April 12, 2022. 

2See APPLICATION to the OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY by BMO Harris Bank N.A. for prior approval to merge  with Bank of the West, January 17, 2022, as listed on Exhibit Volume Indexes, p. 78.

We believe that Bank of the West originated 169 loans to Breckenridge Prop Fund 2016 LL and 8 loans to  Breckenridge Property Fund 201. We further believe that these Breckenridge entities are owned by, or are affiliated with Wedgewood, LLC,3 a real estate firm that has been the subject of significant negative media attention,4 and which was sued by our state Attorney General. The Attorney General’s complaint alleged that  

Wedgewood unlawfully evicted tenants and induced them to vacate their units through cash for keys deals so  that Wedgewood could increase rents on new tenants after renovating buildings, which were often acquired during foreclosure auctions. 

The complaint filed by the Attorney General’s office makes several disturbing allegations of unlawful and improper conduct by Wedgewood, LLC, including unlawful evictions, harassment of tenants, failure to maintain  habitability of units, illegal debt collection practices, and violations of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, the  California Homeowner Bill of Rights and other federal and state laws, amongst other allegations.5 On  December 8, 2021, the Attorney General’s office announced a $3.5 million judgement against Wedgewood which included injunctive relief requiring Wedgewood to alter its practices, provide training to staff, furnish reports to the Attorney General’s office, and pay penalties and restitution to unlawfully evicted tenants.6 

A research paper by Terra Dalton Graziani focused on the practices of Wedgewood LLC in Los Angeles in  2018.7In reviewing property data regarding Wedgewood holdings in Inglewood, eviction filings, and interviews with eviction defense attorneys, the report found that: “It is important to point out that what distinguishes  Wedgewood from other real estate investment companies like Blackstone is that it does not act as a landlord long-term – it only flips properties and resells them. Therefore, it is not “providing housing” or any sort of public service. Rather, the only service Wedgewood provides is displacement, in making sure that the buildings it buys are delivered empty to the next buyer.”8 

3See 4See , housing-eviction-wedgewood/ , 


6 7 8

BOTW Loans to Breckenridge Fund LLC, a subsidiary of Wedgewood Inc. 

Within the past year, we believe that Bank of the West has made 40 loans to Breckenridge Property Fund to buy properties in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, with many in low to moderate-income neighborhoods. In light of the serious allegations and concerns raised against the practices of Wedgewood Inc., greater  regulatory scrutiny is required to determine if any BOTW loans were improperly given favorable treatment during the Bank’s prior CRA examination, and whether any BOTW displacement mortgages are enabling harmful conduct and exacerbating community credit needs. 

We urge the regulators to review the CRA submissions of Bank of the West to ensure that no community development loan or other CRA credit was given to Bank of the West for loans originated to Wedgewood,  Breckenridge Property Fund entities or other borrowers that have a business model or practice of evicting  

tenants, failing to maintain habitability of units, raising rents and/or removing affordable housing units from the local affordable housing stock. Such displacement mortgages run counter to the goals of the CRA and should result in CRA ratings downgrades, not CRA credit.

BMO Harris should agree to abide by CRC’s Anti-Displacement Code of Conduct which has been endorsed by  over 100 organizations.9 We have called for all financial institutions to enhance their due diligence procedures  to ensure they are not lending to problematic landlords subject to litigation and complaints or with displacing  business models, that bank borrowers fully understand their obligations to honor state and local tenant  protections laws, that banks do not underwrite to higher rents than what tenants are currently paying, that  banks follow up with their borrowers and tenants to ensure there are no problems at their properties post origination, and that banks intervene where problems arise. The banking regulators’ recently released Notice of  Proposed Rulemaking on CRA appears to acknowledge that banks can play an important role in displacing or  stabilizing communities.10 

Home Lending in California 

We want to acknowledge and appreciate BMO Harris Bank (BHB) for the transparency it provides in its  response to initial community comments. Unlike other banks, BHB identifies the peer group it is using in its  analysis and provides actual data on its lending performance in relations to peers, even where it  underperforms. This is a welcome contrast to nearly every other bank HMDA analysis we have seen which is  silent as to peers, vague as to data performance, and unwilling to concede any deficiency.  

2021 HMDA data has been made available since BHB filed its application and since it responded to community  commenters in its letter dated March 11, 2022. As such, we urge the regulators to scrutinize the 2021 HMDA  data for both BMO Harris and BOTW. Our early analysis, which seeks to replicate BHB’s focus on single family  lending at less than the national level and as compared to a “similarly sized bank peer group,” finds disparities.  More specifically, we focus on Bank of the West’s lending in California and compare it to bank lenders with a  similar number of HMDA-reportable loans.11 

  • BOTW took in 17,842 applications for single family loans in California and originated 10,139 loans. All but 29 of BOTW loans were conventional. BOTW lagged peer performance with regard to the  percentage of loans that were FHA (.2% v .3%) and VA (.1% v 1.6%). 
  • BOTW exceeded peers with regard to LMI tract (LMIT) lending (15.2% v 13.8%) yet lagged peers with  regard to lending to LMI borrowers (11.2% v 13%). While mortgage lending in LMI neighborhoods is  positive and consistent with CRA, we believe further research is needed to determine if BOTW lending  in LMI areas is crowding out home ownership opportunities for LMI borrowers and borrowers of color,  or otherwise exacerbating gentrification pressures. 
  • BOTW barely exceeded peer lending performance in neighborhoods of color (45.1% v 43%). BOTW exceeded peer lending to Asian borrowers (21.7% v 16.7%) and matched peer lending to Native  American borrowers (.1%), Further research is needed to determine if BOTW lending to Asian  borrowers was focused on higher income borrowers and groups that are well served by the traditional  market, or if BOTW borrowers were lower-income and represented underserved Asian groups. 


10 See for example, NPR, p. 46, available at: 20220505.pdf 

11 Includes insured depository institutions with HMDA-reportable mortgage loan volume between 50% and 200% of Bank of the  West’s total HMDA-reportable mortgage loan volume during the 2021 reporting year.

  • Of great concern, BOTW lagged peer lending to African American (1.2% v 2.1%) and Latine (10.4% v  13.5%) borrowers.  

Redlining Risk. Focusing on lending activity by Bank of the West and using LendingPatterns software to  explore redlining risk,12 we find statistically significant disparities for BOTW across several categories of activity  in neighborhoods of color compared to its activity in white neighborhoods in CA: 

BOTW shows statistically significant disparities for its share of applications taken in white neighborhoods  compared to its share of applications from: 

  • Black neighborhoods 

Looking at applications that were withdrawn, which can be a measure of high loan fallout suggesting issues  with the loan process, BOTW’s share of applications withdrawn in white neighborhoods showed statistically  significant disparities compared to its share of applications withdrawn in: 

  • Majority-Minority neighborhoods 

Looking at applications that were approved but not accepted, which can be a measure of high loan fallout  suggesting issues with the loan process. BOTW’s share of applications approved but not accepted in white  neighborhoods showed statistically significant disparities compared to its share of applications approved but  not accepted in: 

  • Black neighborhoods 

Looking at approvals, statistically significant disparities exist between BOTW share of loan approvals in white  neighborhoods compared to its share of loan approvals in:  

  • Latine neighborhoods 
  • Majority Minority neighborhoods  
  • Majority Black/Latine neighborhoods  

Looking at loan denials, BOTW shows statistically significant disparities for its share of loan denials in white  neighborhoods compared to its share of loan denials in: 

  • Latine neighborhoods 
  • Majority Minority neighborhoods 
  • Majority Black/Latine neighborhoods 

More specifically, looking at collateral loan denials, BOTW shows statistically significant disparities for its share  of collateral loan denials in white neighborhoods compared to its share of loan denials in: Black neighborhoods 

  • Latine neighborhoods 
  • Majority Black/Latine neighborhoods 

g A product of ComplianceTech.

Finally, looking at subprime loan pricing, BOTW shows statistically significant disparities for subprime pricing in  white neighborhoods compared to its: 

  • Subprime spread to Latine neighborhoods 
  • Subprime spread in Majority Black/Latine neighborhoods 

Gap/Parity Analysis. What do these disparities mean in practical terms? A gap analysis – which considers how  many more loans a lender would need to make to achieve parity with regard to its share of lending in white  neighborhoods – shows the following: 

  • Majority Minority Tracts. BOTW would have needed to originate 1,106 additional loans in  California’s neighborhoods of color if it were to achieve parity with its lending in white  neighborhoods. 

We are concerned that Bank of the West’s mortgage lending lags its peers with regard to lending to certain  underserved borrowers and communities. We urge the regulators to more fully review and analyze the 2021  HMDA data, investigate any Fair Housing Act concerns, and condition any approval of this merger on the Bank  taking concrete steps and making concrete commitments to lend to underserved groups and neighborhoods.  We have proposed to the Bank ways to do so, in our draft Community Benefits Agreement, which is attached  to this letter.  

To address any disparities, we urge the Bank to commit to: 

  • Set goals to increase lending to borrowers and neighborhoods of color annually. Develop a Special Purpose Credit Program to target homeownership opportunities to BIPOC  households. We believe that all banks should develop one or more Special Purpose Credit Programs to  begin to address the history of discrimination and exclusion of BIPOC consumers and communities  from mainstream banking and finance. The SPCP should target 1,106 loans to make up for BOTW’s  shortfall of loans in neighborhoods of color and should focus on African American and Latine borrowers  who have been particularly underserved by BOTW. 
  • Develop, market, and offer FHA, VA, and ITIN (Individual Tax Identification Number) loan products. Over 99% of BOTW’s single-family loan originations in California are conventional loans. FHA lending  does appear to provide access for certain borrowers of color and developing an FHA loan product may  help the Bank better provide equal access to all borrowers and communities. One important caveat is  that we believe that all lenders offering conventional and FHA financing must ensure that their  borrowers are able to get the best priced product for which they qualify (in other words, they must “refer  up” any FHA applicants to conventional loans for which they qualify). To do otherwise presents its own  serious fair housing concerns. We urge BMO Harris to offer and market an FHA loan product and to  guarantee its borrowers the best-priced product for which they qualify. BMO Harris indicates that it will  offer VA loans. 
  • Work with nonprofit housing counseling agencies to develop a portfolio product that meets the needs of  BIPOC homebuyers and home loan seekers in California, and partner with such groups to reach  borrowers that the Bank may be missing.

Foreclosure Prevention and Property Disposition 

We urge BMO Harris to:  

  • Commit to work with housing counselors to reach homeowners before processing any “no contact”  foreclosures, which are triggered by a bank’s inability to reach the homeowner. Borrowers may have  any number of reasons for failing to respond to servicers, including limited broadband access, language  barriers, and fear of contacting a creditor.13 In other words, the bank should not foreclose on any  California homeowner where the Bank has been unable to contact the homeowner, unless and until the  Bank first partners with a local nonprofit housing counseling agency to reach the homeowner. 
  • Develop policies that put distressed and REO single family and multi-family properties in the hands of  nonprofit CDFIs, Community Land Trusts, and other mission-driven affordable housing groups that can  potentially preserve the tenancies of any existing occupants and keep the units affordable and off of the  speculative market. 
  • Participate in California’s Homeowner Assistance Fund/Mortgage Relief program and agree to halt all  foreclosure activity when a delinquent borrower has applied for HAF funds, in order to prevent dual  tracking. 

These issues become all the more important as homeowners continue to struggle as foreclosure moratoria  have lifted.  

Overdraft and Related Fees 

While we were pleased to read of BMO Harris Bank’s reform to its overdraft policies, we believe that both  banks have here failed to serve community credit needs in this regard and can do better going forward.  

BMO Harris’ recent announcements do nothing for consumers who have been gouged in the past by BMO  Harris and Bank of the West overdraft practices. In 2020, Bank of the West levied $41,882,000 in overdraft and  related fees on its own customers, which represented 7.6% of net income ($545,712,000), which was twice the  average ratio for the industry. Bank of the West charged even more overdraft fees in 2021, charging its  customers $47,328,000. According to the Center for Responsible Lending, which utilizes this methodology, for  all banks with at least $1 billion in assets that provided data to regulators, 5.0% of noninterest income came  from such fees in 2019,14 and 3.65% in 2020.1516 

According to analysis by the CFPB, Bank of the West’s overdraft policies have been particularly onerous and  oppressive to consumers, charging a high $35 per overdraft, allowing consumers to overdraft a high 5 times a  

13 See: 

14 Laura Alix, “Two more regional banks are rethinking overdraft fees,” American Banker, June 15, 2021. 15 Industry aggregate figures for overdraft fees as a percentage of non-interest income for 2019 and 2020 are derived from analysis  and methodology employed by the Center for Responsible Lending. 

16 The American Banker has used a similar methodology in analyzing disclosures by more than 500 banks and found that average  overdraft fees as a percentage of non-interest income was 2.78% for banks with over $10 Billion in assets, and 4.49% for banks with  $10 Billion or less in assets. See, Polo Rocha, “Small banks face bigger threat to overdraft fees this time around,” American Banker,  July 27, 2021.

day, and providing consumers a small cushion of $5 before overdraft fees kick in. And while several of its  competitors have made recent changes to overdraft policies, Bank of the West has apparently made none.17 

This is clearly a matter of nationwide and statewide concern. Recently our Attorney General Bonta joined a  multistate coalition in urging the nation’s largest banks to eliminate overdraft fees.18 

Again, we applaud BMO Harris for taking steps to reduce overdraft fees. But the Bank still charges $36 per  overdraft, a fee even higher than that charged by Bank of the West.19 While we applaud progress on this front,  we note that other banks have gone further, with Capital One abandoning overdraft fees altogether,20 and Bank  of America and First Citizens Bank announcing they will reduce overdraft fees to $10 per overdraft.21 We urge  BMO Harris to end overdraft charges entirely, or at a minimum, to reduce the fee to $10. 


We remain concerned that bank branches across the industry have been closing at an alarming rate. Even  though this merger does not present concerns about overlapping branches, both banks have nonetheless  closed branches in recent years. The closure of branches in LMI, Majority Minority and rural communities  demonstrates a failure to adequate serve community credit needs. It also raises concerns about the  convenience and needs of communities going forward, as BMO Harris and Bank of the West have not needed  merger-related branch overlap to justify closing branches. Branch closures threaten to kill jobs for front line  branch workers, push consumers out of the financial mainstream and into higher cost financial products, and  reduce the flow of capital into the community. One Federal Reserve research paper has shown a correlation  between branch presence and small business lending.22 

According to research by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition23

  • Bank of the West closed 19 branches between 2017 and 2021. 

o BOTW closed more branches in Majority Minority Neighborhoods than White Neighborhoods. 


1818 fees 


20 Allissa Kline, Jon Pryor, Laura Alix, “Why more banks are weaning themselves off overdraft fees,” American Banker, June 3, 2021,  noting that Ally Bank will permanently stop charging overdraft fees, and that Huntington Bank launched a line of credit for  emergency expenses that figures to erode its overdraft fee revenue. PNC Financial Services Group and Cullen/Frost Bankers had  announced changes earlier this year that are expected to reduce their haul from overdraft fees. 

21 See, 22 Anenberg, Elliot, Andrew C. Chang, Serafin Grundl, Kevin B. Moore, and Richard Windle (2018). “The Branch Puzzle: Why Are there  Still Bank Branches?” FEDS Notes. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 20, 2018,, noting, “among banks that are CRA reporters the share of loans made by lenders without  a local branch presence remains quite low. This finding suggests that local branch presence is still important for small business  lending.” 



o BOTW closed more branches in LMI Neighborhoods than Middle- and Upper-Income Neighborhoods. 

  • BMO Harris closed 38 branches, or 7.1% of its branch network, during the same period of 2017-2021, a  higher percentage than the average rate of branch closures.  

o BMO Harris had a 4.1% decrease in branch presence in LMI Majority Minority Neighborhoods. BMO Harris closed 31 branches during the first 20 months of the pandemic, a 241% increase over its 9  branch closures in the 20 months preceding the pandemic. 

Bank of the West National Branch Closures 

BMO Harris National Branch Closures


The importance of bank branches is heightened in rural communities. A report by the Consumer Financial  Protection Bureau (CFPB) found that rural Americans depend on physical branches, with 9 out of 10  households visiting a bank branch in 2019. The report further found that rural consumers were less likely to  have a credit history and more likely to use non-bank financial providers, paying more for credit.24 

BMO Harris must commit to open branches in LMI, of color and rural communities in California at the same  time that it commits to no branch closures in our state.  

Small Business Lending 

While we believe that both Bank of the West and BMO Harris have done a good job lending to small  businesses in LMI neighborhoods, we are concerned that both banks may focus small business lending on  larger companies, on larger loan sizes, and through the use of credit cards, which generally come at higher  rates than term and other loan products. 

An analysis of Bank of the West’s 2018-2020 small business lending data in California found:  5529 total loans originated 

  • 39% of loans were originated to businesses with revenue less than $1 million 
  • 30% of loans were originated in LMI neighborhoods 



CRC urges that at least 50% of all non-credit card small business loans to be originated to business with less  than $1 million in revenue, and for at least 50% of all small business loans to be originated in loan amounts of  less than $250,000. 

BMO Harris record on small business lending is even worse using this metric. From 2018 through 2020, CRA  Small Business Lending data in California show: 

  • 5,016 total business loans 
  • 30% to businesses with revenue less than $1 million 
  • 30% in LMI neighborhoods. 

We do not know how much of BOTW or BMO Harris’ small business lending is credit card lending, though we  suspect it might be a substantial percentage. CRC has long discouraged the reliance by banks on credit card  lending to serve small businesses. 

While Bank of the West acknowledges it has no specialized products targeted to African American and Latine  borrowers, BMO Harris is to be commended for establishing a Special Purpose Credit Program for such  businesses and for announcing a $5 Billion commitment to underserved businesses.  

As part of this merger, BMO Harris should commit to: 

  • Prioritize non-credit card lending to small businesses. 
  • Increase small business lending in LMI census tracts each year. 
  • Originate 50% of non-credit card small business loans to businesses with less than $1 million in  revenue. 
  • Originate 50% of non-credit card small business loans in loan amounts of $250,000 or less. Commit $100 million in loans to be originated though the Bank’s SPCP to African American and Latine  small business owners in California, refining the product as needed in consultation with CRC and other  community groups. 
  • Actively participate in the state’s Small Business Loan Guarantee Program and otherwise leverage  SSBCI funds that are expected to come to the state to support small businesses. 


In the US, 6% of Americans, or more than 20 million people, do not have access to high-speed Wi-Fi. Many of them live in rural areas. The World Economic Forum reported that this number is likely understated and that 19 million unconnected households are in rural areas.25 

The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas found that there are two reasons for the lack of adoption of financial  services – financial exclusion and digital exclusion.26 Without widespread access and connection to high-speed  

25 26


Internet, technology will never be the great equalizer. Instead, it will continue to widen the divide and  underscore the systemic racial barriers that permeate multiple overlapping systems. 

While a record percentage of California households are connected to the Internet, 15% of households in the state, nearly 2 million people, are digitally disadvantaged. Approximately 1.25 million, or roughly 9.6%, are unconnected, and approximately 730,000, or roughly 5.6%, are under-connected. The digital divide remains especially challenging for a sizable number of low-income and Latine households, seniors, and people with disabilities. With so many activities having gone digital during the pandemic, such as online banking, the disadvantage only has grown more acute. Affordability is the main reason that keeps households from connecting to the Internet, with digital literacy and the lack of appropriate computing devices also being relevant factors.27 

The Biden Administration has proposed closing the digital divide by including a $65 dollar investment to ensure that, “Every American has access to reliable high-speed Internet,” and by lowering the cost of Internet for low-income households by requiring providers to offer low cost, affordable plans.28 This public investment of taxpayer dollars seeks to end “digital redlining” while also growing the customer base for privately owned Internet providers. Our Governor and Legislature have also committed significant resources to addressing digital equity issues.29 

We believe that banks and other financial institutions should become part of the digital equity solution. Specifically, banks must support efforts to increase infrastructure access to high-speed broadband, increase access to devices and increase access to digital literacy training on a wide scale. The BMO  Harris/BOTW transaction represents a large merger involving banks that are likely to have CRA assessment  areas including underserved Native American communities and tribal lands, as well as rural communities with  insufficient broadband access.  

A series of CRC surveys of financial institutions, CRC member organizations, and participants in CRC’s  Economic Health Promotora program found that: 

  • Banks are funding a variety of broadband initiatives and are motivated to garner CRA credit for such  activities, but often want to better understand local broadband needs, opportunities, and capacities. A majority of CRC and Greenlining Institute member respondents indicated that broadband access was  a significant need in their communities. 
  • 40% of Economic Equity Promotora workshop participants reported they did not have internet access  before the pandemic, while 22% reported they gained access during the pandemic due to policy and  program initiatives designed to increase access. 

We urge BMO Harris to make a substantial commitment to increasing digital equity and broadband access in  our state through one or more of the following activities:  


28 29


  • Providing starting and working capital to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) looking to expand their  footprint in underserved markets. 
  • Providing volunteers to assist businesses involved in digital equity and seeking to expand broadband  access with financial planning and marketing.  
  • Extending grant funding to businesses to get connected to middle-mile fiber lines. Extending grant funding to local organizations seeking to expand digital equity and inclusion via  computer/device supply, digital literacy training, and other measures. 
  • Providing in-house digital literacy training coupled with financial literacy training for bank customers,  particularly those who may be impacted by mergers and potential bank branch closures. 


According to Bank of the West’s CRA Performance Evaluation, it donated $9.3 Million in philanthropy from  2017-2019. We find this to be extremely low for a bank of its size and reflect poor performance and a  significant failure to help meet community credit needs. BMO Harris should commit to substantially increase  contributions to support homeownership and affordable housing, small business and economic development,  financial coaching and wealth building initiatives, fair housing and tenants’ rights, and efforts to combat  homelessness and displacement in California.  

Climate Resiliency and Fossil Fuels 

We appreciate that federal banking and other regulators are looking increasingly to the risks to our financial  sector of climate change. We believe that banks can continue to play a key role in the further destruction of our  planet or, alternatively, can help move our economy and communities towards climate resiliency. The  consequences of this decision will have the greatest impact on the low- and moderate-income communities  and communities of color that the CRA is mean to benefit, and that should be at the forefront of the regulators’  analysis of this merger application. 

That is why we are genuinely concerned to see BNP Paribas and Bank of Montreal MUFG listed as #10 and  #16 on a list of financial institutions funding fossil fuels, with $120.825 Billion and $97.207 Billion respectively, in support of this destructive industry from 2016 through 2020.30 Combined, a BNP/BMO pro forma bank would  rank as the #4 funder of fossil fuels. 

Further RAN analysis shows bank holding company BNP Paribas to be among the largest underwriters of  fossil fuel bond and equity issuances. 

30 See Rainforest Action Network (RAN), “Banking on Climate Chaos,” at: 



As such, we urge the Banks, consistent with International Energy Agency (IEA) Net Zero Emissions Scenario  standards31, to: 

  • Agree to end all financing of fossil fuel expansion. 
  • Agree to best in class disclosure of fossil fuel and climate related activity. 
  • Acknowledge that climate change has an outsized impact on the financially vulnerable. Commit to significant investment in the development and construction of energy efficient and climate resilient affordable housing and energy efficiency improvements for homes and businesses and green spaces in communities of color. 
  • Take a position of supporting the SEC climate disclosure rules.

Communities impacted by bank mergers such as this proposed merger have the right to basic facts about how  banks are addressing or exacerbating the climate crisis so that they can make informed decisions about which  institutions with which they choose to bank and conduct business. Such information should include, at a  minimum, annual disclosure of quantitative and qualitative data regarding environmental issues, exposure to  carbon-intensive activities and assets, and details on fossil fuel financing and clients. Any pro forma bank must  be transparent about its impacts on the environment and must begin to ramp up its investments in green  initiatives in order to mitigate the harm caused by past investment policies. 

31 See, economist


Labor Rights 

In 2018, BNP Paribas and UNI Global Union entered into a labor agreement that addresses fundamental  employee rights relating to: human rights, social dialogue and trade union rights; social and environmental  responsibility; employment management and change management; gender equality in the workplace;  promotion of diversity and inclusion; preventing and combating psychological and sexual harassment; and  health and quality of life at work.32 We urge BMO Harris to accept these or substantially similar commitments. If  BMO Harris rejects these employee rights principles, then the acquisition by BMO Harris of Bank of the West  could not be said to provide a public benefit, as required.  

Public Hearings Are Required 

Again, we urge the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to grant our  request for public hearings and an extension of the comment period. The agencies agreed to hold such  hearings for the proposed merger of U.S. Bank and MUFG Union Bank, another merger that threatens to have  an outsized impact on California. Granting a public hearing will enable the agencies to meet their responsibility  to subject this mega merger to the close scrutiny it demands. We urge the regulators to reject this merger  proposal unless BMO Harris commits to a strong Community Benefits Agreement that is negotiated with  community groups and which has mechanisms in place to ensure compliance and public benefit. And the only  way to meaningful ensure compliance with any CBA is for the regulators to condition merger approval on the  acceptance of, and continuing compliance with, a strong CBA. 

We include as an attachment a proposed CBA that we submitted to the Bank over two months ago and to  which we still await a formal response. 

Without a strong Community Benefits Agreement, we believe that the bank applicants have not demonstrated  that they have sufficiently met community credit needs, that they will meet the convenience and needs of  communities going forward, or that this merger will provide a public benefit.  

If you have any questions about this letter, or would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Paulina  Gonzalez-Brio at, or Kevin Stein at  

Thank you for your consideration of our views. 



Paulina Gonzalez-Brito Kevin Stein Jamie Buell Executive Director Chief of Legal and Strategy Research Analyst 



cc: Maxine Waters, Chair, HFSC 

Sherrod Brown, Chair, Senate Banking Committee 

Jesse Van Tol, CEO, National Community Reinvestment Coalition


CRC’s Draft Proposal for a BMO Harris California Community Benefits Agreement 2.25.22 Overall commitment: 

Beginning in 2023 and extending over the next 5 years, BMO Harris Bank pledges to increase its  overall qualified CRA lending, investment, charitable contribution, supplier diversity, and related  activities as described below, to achieve a minimum of $30 billion in cumulative qualified CRA activity  in California as defined below during this 5-year period. 

To achieve this cumulative commitment, we have identified the following goals for each of the key  components of the CRA qualified activity. Over the term of the commitment, the goal is to achieve the  following: 

Homeownership – $7 Billion in LMI Mortgages: 

  • Mortgage volume: Annually increase mortgage originations for each of the following: Mortgage lending to LMI borrowers. 
  • Mortgage lending to African American borrowers. 
  • Mortgage lending to Latine borrowers. 
  • Increase lending to each Latine disaggregated group. 
  • Mortgage lending to Asian American Pacific Islander borrowers. 
  • Increase lending to each AAPI disaggregated group. 
  • Mortgage lending to Native American borrowers. 
  • Mortgage lending in LMI census tracts; and 
  • Mortgage lending in majority-minority census tracts. 
  • Government insured mortgages. Increase marketing and origination of FHA and VA loans to  meet local community credit needs. 
  • Commit that all borrowers are offered the Best Priced Product for which they qualify – no  steering to FHA or other higher cost products. 
  • Mortgage disparities. Close the gap each year where proportional lending to different  race/ethnic borrowers and communities (ex. lending to African American borrowers) lags peer  performance and exceed peer performance in these lending categories by year 5. 
  • ITIN mortgages: Market and originate a mortgage product that is accessible to Individual Tax  Identification Number (ITIN) borrowers. 
  • SPCP. Work with community groups to develop a Special Purpose Credit Program (SPCP)  mortgage product to target underserved BIPOC homebuyers in California and commit $100  million for such loans. 
  • Support for first time homebuyers. Provide assistance to first time homebuyers which could  include assistance that (a) is up to 3.0% of the purchase price for properties in LMI census  tracts, without income restrictions and (b) up to 5.0% for properties in LMI census tracts with  income restrictions and (c) 7.5% for properties in LMI census tracts, with income restrictions,  and minority populations greater than 50%.


  • Ethnic Media: Provide $2.5 million in grants over the course of the Plan to nonprofit  organizations and ethnic media that will assist the bank in reaching additional LMI and diverse  homeowner and prospective homebuyer clients. Grants will be awarded through an open and  transparent process. These marketing dollars shall be separate from the Bank’s philanthropy  budget. 
  • Loan officers. Increase loan officer staffing by 1 FTE per year for the Plan period focused on  LMI and majority-minority census tracts. The Bank will consider diversity and experience  working in underserved communities when making hiring decisions. 
  • Housing counseling support. Provide $7 million over five years in philanthropic allocations to  housing counseling organizations, legal aid offices and fair housing organizations, and get this  money out as quickly as possible, especially for organizations serving BIPOC that are being hit  the hardest by the pandemic. This support will help grow the pipeline of mortgage-ready, first time homebuyers through pre- and post-purchase homebuyer education, credit rehabilitation  counseling, and will serve as the first line of defense to keep homeowners in their homes when  faced with foreclosure. 
  • Homeless prevention. Provide $2 Million in grant support for homelessness prevention and  support services, including mental health services. This support will be prioritized to  organizations led by African Americans in order to address the disproportionate impact  homelessness has on African American residents. 
  • Appraisal bias. Be part of the solution in objecting to pressure low-income homebuyers are  under to waive appraisal and inspection contingencies, which can have devastating  consequences for homebuyers. Fund nonprofit housing counselors who can advise clients  against this and be a voice for ethical industry practices. 
  • Foreclosure Prevention
  • Offer forbearance for up to a year for all mortgage borrowers, regardless of whether the  loan is federally backed. Provide reasonable repayment plans and loan modifications  post-forbearance. 
  • Freeze foreclosures due to “no contact,” and commit to connect the homeowner with a  nonprofit housing counseling organization, confirm that the nonprofit has contacted the  homeowner, and consider the homeowner for all available loss mitigation options before  resuming foreclosure proceedings. 
  • Continue participation in the California Mortgage Relief Program and commit to halt all  foreclosure proceedings where homeowners have applied for such relief. 
  • REO policies. Extend a right of first refusal to non-profit organizations, including Community  Land Trusts and nonprofit affordable housing groups, on Bank REO properties (single family  and multi-family properties). The Bank should make 50% of such properties available at no or  low cost to nonprofit groups. 

Small Business Lending – $15 billion in Small Business Lending 

  • SBA, term loans, and lines of credit (non-credit card lending): Annually increase small  business lending for each of the following 
  • LMI borrowers 
  • African American borrowers


  • Latine borrowers 
  • Increase lending to each Latine disaggregated group 
  • Asian American Pacific Islander borrowers 
  • Increase lending to each AAPI disaggregated group. 
  • Native American borrowers. 
  • LMI census tracts. 
  • Majority-minority census tracts. 
  • Smaller loans and smaller businesses: Achieve 50% of the number of small business loans  each year originated in loan amounts under $150,000, as well as achieve 50% of small  business lending each year to businesses with under $500,000 in revenue, and increase  originations in these two areas, year over year. 
  • ITIN loans. Lend to small business owners that do not have a social security number and use  ITIN. 
  • Line of credit initiative. Develop a line of credit product for smaller businesses, in partnership  with CDFIs and small business technical assistance providers who focus on increasing  contracting and revenue opportunities for disadvantaged businesses. This partnership will  focus on working with CDFIs and technical assistance agencies led by people of color. This  should include capacity building support to implement the product(s) using the bank’s own  technology and/or technical capacity. Dedicate $25 million to support this effort. 
  • Plan to target smaller businesses. In support of Bank efforts to increase access to credit for  smaller businesses (for businesses with <$500,000 in revenue) and to increase lending to  diverse businesses in our California communities, the Bank commits to the following: 
  • Unrestricted grants. Provide unrestricted CRA-qualified charitable contributions for  organizations to use as they see fit. 
  • Technical assistance and loan loss reserve. Support small business technical  assistance provided by nonprofit providers and commit to allocate $2 million annually for  technical assistance and $500,000 annually for loan loss reserve funding, with  emphasis on SBA micro lenders doing loans less than or equal to $50,000. The bank  will develop a plan for a formalized selection and implementation process for its  technical assistance and loan loss reserve program, with community input. 
  • Referral programs. Formalize a process to refer a minimum of 30% of small business  loan denials to local Technical Assistance providers, CDFIs and/or other community  development lenders in the Bank’s assessment areas. Prioritize BIPOC led TA  providers, CDFIs and other community development lenders and expand referral  program partners. 
  • SGLP. Actively participate in the California state-guarantee loan program. SSBCI. Actively participate in SSBCI programs which will provide a meaningful  opportunity for the bank to leverage federal dollars. 

Work with the CA IBank, Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs), Community  Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) and other mission driven capital  providers to develop a U.S. Department of Treasury approved $1 Billion “LOAN  PARTICIPATION” program supported by a 10% loss share by the IBank’s SSBCI  2.0 allocated funds to achieve the 10:1 leverage goal.


Work with Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs), Community Development  Financial Institutions (CDFIs) and other mission driven capital lenders to  

collaborate and develop data collection and reporting platforms to comply with  the final Section 1071 rules.  

  • SBA. Develop an SBA product offering and become a Preferred SBA lender. Commit to  increasing overall SBA lending each year. Of the total commitment for SBA lending,  50% each year shall be to underserved communities and low and-moderate-income  census tracts. Additionally, 50% of SBA lending annually shall be in loan amounts of  $150,000 or less, and the number of loans of such lending shall increase each year. 
  • SPCP. Work with community groups to develop and/or bring to California a Special Purpose  Credit Program (SPCP) product with a goal of advancing credit access for underserved small  businesses and commit $300 Million for this program. 
  • Ethnic media. Provide $2.5 Million in grants over the course of the Plan to nonprofit and ethnic  media organizations that will assist the bank in reaching additional LMI and BIPOC small  business customers. This grant will be awarded through an open and transparent process.  These marketing dollars shall be separate from the Bank’s philanthropy budget. 
  • Grants to small businesses. Set aside $10 million to provide direct grants to small business  owners suffering from pandemic related impacts. 
  • Donate PPP fees. Donate all of the Bank’s proceeds from PPP loans to grants to small  businesses with less than $1 million in revenue or to CDFIs and other community led initiatives  to mitigate the adverse impacts of COVID-19, with a targeted focus on supporting  organizations led by and serving BIPOC. These PPP dollars will be separate from the Bank’s  philanthropy budget. 

Community Development – $5 billion in CD lending and $3 billion in CD  investments: 

  • Deep affordability. Ensure that at least 70% of lending and investment in affordable housing is targeted to deed restricted affordable rental housing for persons experiencing homelessness,  extremely low-income households, and very low-income households.  
  • Developers of color. Create a $20 million investment fund to build the capacity of affordable  housing developers of color and to finance housing projects sponsored by such developers  that are targeted to neighborhoods and residents of color. 
  • Community lender EQ2 funds. Dedicate $200 million annually in EQ2 funds, of which an  annual pool of $100 million will be establish for Community Development Financial Institutions,  Community Development Corporations, faith-based lenders, and other non-profit community  development funds led by people of color and with assets less than $2 million, initiated through  formal broad based “request for proposal” (RFP) processes. 
  • CLT product. Develop a product designed to help Community Land Trusts and similar entities  purchase, acquire and/or rehab properties in California to ensure permanent affordability of  housing. Provide mortgages for homeowners purchasing as part of a CLT ownership structure,  including with ITIN mortgages. Commit funding for CLTs and Limited Equity Coops. 
  • Broadband. Support regional and local efforts to bring high speed internet/broadband to  underserved communities and residents through:


  • financing infrastructure to expand access to communities that lack such access. devoting bank staff time, expertise, and networks through the use of community service  hours for participation in regional and local collaboratives. 
  • funding planning grants for local communities 
  • providing appropriate devices to community residents. 
  • funding digital literacy training so residents can take advantage of access to high-speed  internet/broadband services. 
  • The bank will commit $20 million to these efforts. 
  • Acquisition rehab. Commit $25 million for investments ($22 million) and capacity building  grants ($3 million) to support housing nonprofits including community land trusts and  community efforts to acquire and preserve distressed assets, consistent with state policy to  encourage the purchase of distressed properties with up to 25 units by nonprofits, community  land trusts, and tenant occupants. 
  • SBICs. Invest annually in CRA-qualified small business investment companies (SBIC’s), with  20% targeted for minority enterprises. 
  • In-fill. Prioritize infill and small site development. 
  • Green housing. Help nonprofits purchase, refinance, weatherize, decarbonize, and provide  high speed internet in their buildings. 
  • Green initiatives. Dedicate $25 million in investment dollars for community development  initiatives that bolster climate resiliency and that are led by people of color and located in  communities of color. 
  • Public banking. Dedicate investment and deposit dollars to support any state or local public  bank established in California. 
  • LIHTC. Commit to Low Income Housing Tax Credits for 2023 at $225 Million and increase this  amount by 25% each year over 5 years. This increase in LIHTC investments is meant to  acknowledge the unique impact of this merger on California communities. 
  • Staffing. Commit to hire community development staff to be located in and serve each region  of the state, including, at a minimum: Los Angeles, Southern California, the Central Valley, the  San Francisco Bay Area, and the Northern counties. 


The Bank agrees to: 

  • BankOn. Offer, actively market and service an account that serves the banking needs of the  unbanked, underbanked, and low-to-moderate income communities within the Bank’s assessment areas within one year from the date of this commitment. This will be done in  accordance with the BankOn standards, and the Model Safe Account guidelines developed by  the FDIC and will include a savings, checking, and cash-secured credit card feature. The bank  shall not use Chexsystems screening on these accounts and will not report to Chexsystems on  these accounts. The Bank will accept ITINs and a Matricula Card in lieu of an SSN for financial  products. 
  • Overdraft fees. Further refine overdraft policies to eliminate overdraft fees, or, at a minimum, to  reduce the charge per overdraft to $10.


  • Waive EBT fees. Commit to reconfigure all ATMs to waive out-of-network surcharges for  California public assistance recipients who use Electronic Benefits Transfer Cards (EBT). Youth account. Establish a checking and savings account for young people under 22. The  bank will not use Chexsytems for this account and will not require parent/guardian permission  to open. This account will meet the standards agreed to above on affordable accounts. Age-friendly account. Establish an age friendly bank account that is also accessible to  survivors of domestic violence. 
  • State bank accounts. Consider in good faith whether to participate in any state designed  product to make bank accounts accessible to California’s unbanked and underbanked  communities. AB 1177 (Santiago) currently provides one such vehicle. 
  • 10 new branches. Commit to opening 10 new branches in LMI neighborhoods of color and  rural communities and consult with community groups before selecting locations. No branch closures. Commit to not close ANY branches in LMI neighborhoods or  neighborhoods of color. 
  • Payday alternative. The Bank will develop a meaningful low-cost alternative to payday loans. Language access. Make a commitment to meet the language access needs of California’s  diverse population. This will include: 

o Striving to provide written and oral language access in the top 5 non-English languages  spoken in California. 

o Increasing multi-lingual staff or hiring third-party language service providers to translate  materials (e.g., contracts, marketing collateral, loan applications, legal documents,  borrowers’ information and supporting documents, etc.) as well as provide interpretation  services and other forms of language support to facilitate residential mortgage  originations, small business lending, and/or other banking needs through its contact  center and at all of its branches.  

o Taking steps to ensure that web portals and mobile apps are accessible in languages  other than English. 

o Providing financial literacy classes and education about financial products in multiple  languages to reach unbanked and underbanked LEP immigrants.  

Charitable Donations – $50 Million: 

  • Track. Begin to track CRA eligible philanthropic support to organizations led by BIPOC and Commit to increasing the amount of support for these organizations year over year. Support capacity-building efforts for non-profit organizations led by BIPOC. Offer general operating grants to these organizations, with a priority on increasing this  support for organizations led by BIPOC. 
  • Capacity building. Support capacity-building grants for faith-based organizations engaged in  community development and advocacy efforts. 
  • Housing and economic development focus. Commit that at least 70% of the Bank’s  contributions will be for housing, economic development, financial capability, fair housing,  organizing and legal services.


  • Step up grants. Dedicate $8 Million for contributions in 2023 and increase this amount by $1  Million each year. This annual increase in contributions is meant to acknowledge the unique  impact of this merger on California communities. 


  • Anti-displacement. Sign CRC’s Anti Displacement Code of Conduct; review all programs,  products, and policies to ensure compliance with the Code; and report on such efforts. 1071. Support CFPB’s section 1071 data collection rulemaking efforts so that detailed data on  small business lending is collected and made publicly available in order to promote equal  access to credit and to support enforcement efforts against discrimination and fair lending  violations. Be a supportive voice as the CFPB finalizes the rule and commit to work with  community groups to establish new small business lending goals by race, ethnicity, and  gender when the data is public. 
  • Climate Risk and Community Investments. Develop a strategy for handling climate change induced risk, decarbonizing investments, and proactively investing in projects that promote  community resilience. This should include reviewing the Bank’s investment portfolio to assess  both physical and transition risk and a commitment to divest from fossil-fuel intensive  industries. The Bank should provide detailed reporting on its efforts. The Bank should also  ensure its community development efforts include investments to promote climate resiliency  that build wealth in communities of color. 

o This could include expanding the Bank’s commitment to its auto loan product and  supporting an equitable transition to a green economy.  

o Develop a flexible financial vehicle to support low-to-moderate individuals to transition  their homes to affordable solar energy solutions which would reduce their overall costs  of living. 

  • Human rights. Endorse the International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, by confirming that “”BMO strives to create a positive workplace  with open lines of communication. As such, it respects the right of all people to join or not join a  trade union to bargain collectively.” 
  • Anti-trafficking. Endorse and implement the Finance Against Slavery and Trafficking (FAST) framework.

Board Diversity: 

  • Disclosure. Publicly disclose detailed demographic employment information for all employment  levels, including for its Board of Directors and top executives. Many banks already voluntarily  annually disclose their full EEO-1 employment data in a form readily available to facilitate  benchmarking among peer banks. 
  • Diversity. The Bank will have at least 50 percent of its leadership composed of individuals from  underrepresented groups (comprised of persons of color or women) and see an increase in  underrepresented executives in leadership roles over the next 5 years.


Supplier Diversity: 

BMO Harris commits to increase its spending with diverse suppliers, set a goal of 20% diverse spend,  and increase the number of BIPOC suppliers the bank works with over the plan’s period. The Bank  will report on supplier diversity goals and spend with California firms by category annually and meet  with the community representatives to discuss the results and action plans to address any  underperformance. 

Racial Equity Audit: 

BMO Harris will collaborate with community partners to choose a third-party evaluator to conduct a  racial equity audit of the bank’s investments, lending, philanthropy, and policies, and make  recommendations on how to improve the bank’s racial equity impact. 

Community Advisory Board  

The bank shall establish a community advisory board (CAB), comprised of individuals who are deeply connected to the local underserved markets across California. The CAB shall work with the bank to  vet, review and support the bank’s CRA and business strategies with a lens on meeting the unique  needs of California’s diverse markets. 


  • The Bank will commit to meeting annually with CRC and Greenlining and share data showing  compliance to CBA commitments. The CEO of the Bank will attend the annual meeting. The Bank will include this CRA plan in its application to the regulators. 
  • BMO Harris Bank commits to making the plan public and making it available on its website. BMO Harris Bank commits that before the 5-year period is up, it will negotiate a new plan with  these community partners.